I’ve found an interesting site the attempts to tell you how influential you are.
The problem is that it comes to this “score” based on how often you post to Facebook, how often you Tweet and how active you are with other social media.
In other words, if you are influential in ways that do not include the online world you have a low level of influence on Klout.com.
However, if you are very active online you might be interested in what your Klout rating is. The site says the average score is 40. I’m a 10. One of the people I follow on Twitter, ESPN Sportscaster Mark May, is a 79. Everyone else is below 40.
In today’s world, do I need to be very active in social media in order to be influential? I hope not. I have friends that aren’t on Facebook or Twitter, but I believe them to be influential in their communities.
But if I’m interested in how active online I am compared to others, this is an interesting tool.Warren Mills is the webmaster for WTHR-TV. He has been building and working on web sites since the mid-1990s.
What have you noticed when you’ve seen others pull out their smart phones or talked with friends about the type of phone they’re using, are you seeing more Android or more IPhones?
Research firm IDC says Android is increasing it’s hold on the mobile phone market, going from a 47% worldwide share a year ago to 68% today.
The market share for IPhones fell slightly to 17%.
Most of the people I see with smart phones are people I work with, and I’m seeing mostly IPhones, which is contradictory to the information above. And that’s why I put the question out there, what types of phones are you seeing most people using?
As far as other operating systems, Blackberry and Symbian are each below 5% market share with Windows phones having even less.
And if this trend continues, does it mean that Google will be the next Microsoft?Warren Mills is the webmaster for WTHR-TV. He has been building and working on web sites since the mid-1990s.
A new device from Google has me fascinated and concerned. It’s Google Glasses. This is what looks like a normal set of glasses, but off to the side and slightly above one eye is a lens which displays information into the user’s field of vision. With these glasses you can access the internet, receive and make phone calls, take video or pictures or do dozens of other things.
From a geek point of view, this sounds wonderful. I can’t wait to try them out.
But from a societal point of view, I have to wonder what affect it will have.
We’ve already seen people sitting in a restaurant while talking on the phone and ignoring others sitting at the same table. We’ve seen people in the grocery story checking out while talking on the phone and acting like the clerk checking them out doesn’t even exist.
With Google Glasses, if we can not only be on the phone, but also be watching a movie, reading a book or doing research while walking down the street or the hallway, what affect is this going to have. We’ll no longer smile and say “Hi” when we pass a co-worker in the hallway or a friend on the street. We’re already losing some of our face-to-face communication. Will that only get worse?
Or is this a case of the positives outweigh the negatives?
Again, I’d love to try the glasses, but I have non-tech concerns.
Leave a comment and tell me what you think, Google Glasses, good or bad?Warren Mills is the webmaster for WTHR-TV. He has been building and working on web sites since the mid-1990s.
The latest tech gadget that I’m excited about is the Co-Star from Vizio. It turns an HDTV into a smart TV with a one-time cost of $99, below many other streaming players on the market today.
What makes this device different is that it not only has a web browser, but it gives you the full web experience by supporting Flash and HTML 5. This is the only streaming player I’ve seen that supports Flash, and we all know there are hundreds of thousands of web pages that use that technology.
But in addition to the browser, the Co-Star has the features of Google TV. Vizio claims this means you get access to thousands of apps in the Google Play Store along with the already installed Netflix, Amazon and YouTube.
Vizio has partnered up with OnLive, a gaming site that lets you play with no discs or downloads. Personally I’m not a gamer, but for those that are, this is one of the most promoted aspects of Co-Star.
The remote is two-sided. One side has your normal volume, channel, input, etc. controls plus a trackpad. The other side has a QWERTY keyboard for entering text.
Vizio also has apps that turn smart phones and tablets into remotes.
Now for some of the tech details. The only output is HDMI, so if you don’t have an HDMI connection to your TV you’ll need to get some type of converter cable. I’ve got and HDMI to DVI cable that I’m hoping will do the trick. This is the one drawback I’ve found. There is also an HDMI input. The theory is that you run a connection from your cable/satellite box to the Co-Star and then from the Co-Star to your television. This allows you to continue to watch your favorite shows while interacting on the Internet, all on one screen. Maybe you’re watching “The Office” while in a “The Office” chat room.
This player supports 1080p Full HD as well as 3D. You’ll still need a 3D television to watch 3D video.
You can connect to the device with built-in wi-fi and LAN, Bluetooth, USB and DNLA-enabled phones, tablets and computers.
The Co-Star is taking preorders, but be aware that Vizio keeps running out of the product. There is an estimated shipping date of August 14 and will hit stores soon after that.
So not only is this the most complete streaming player I’ve found, but it’s one of the least expensive. Google TV was not ready for prime time when it debuted. But with players like this and an upgrade to the Google TV system, it may now be ready to compete with other systems like Apple TV. Only time will tell.
When I get mine I’ll let you know how well it actually works.Warren Mills is the webmaster for WTHR-TV. He has been building and working on web sites since the mid-1990s.